Improved MP3 Playback
Figure 1, Frequency analysis output MZ-RH1.
Figure 2, Frequency analysis output MZ-RH10.
Figure 3, Frequency analysis output MZ-RH10 (log scale).
There was one comment after another that appeared regarding the MP3 playback in the second generation Hi-MD抯. The most important problem that many people had was that a track in MP3 format sounded a lot duller on an MD-walkman than the ATRAC version of the same MP3. This could of course make the ATRAC version sound a lot better than the source from which it was made. However if you played the ATRAC and MP3 version back on the PC there was no audible difference. After some further research by members of the MD community it appeared that if you compared the frequency spectrum of MP3 and ATRAC that the characteristic frequency of MP3 and ATRAC (and also PCM) through the headphone out started at a frequency of 1 KHz (1000 Hz) and slowly fell until 20 KHz (the upper limit of what most people can hear) that a difference of approximately 6db had occurred. This was why when playing back MP3抯 the high tones were much less audible resulting in the music sounding much duller and less lively. People have tried to resolve this issue by using the equalizer then you always had to change the settings yourself depending on whether you were listening to an ATRAC track or MP3. This led many people to go ahead and convert everything to ATRAC.
Therefore one of the first things we wanted to try in the RH1 when we got our hands on it was this 揷omplaint?to see if Sony themselves had also arrived at the same conclusions and had improved it. On site at Sony we briefly had the chance to test this and it indeed seemed as if the problem (either partially or entirely) had been solved. On the return trip home we were more and more persuaded of this since we couldn抰 hear any clear difference anymore between ATRAC, PCM and MP3. Of course we also wanted to 揷oncretely?confirm these findings doing a frequency analysis of both one PCM, ATRAC3Plus (256 kbps) and MP3 (256 kbps) file. In fact the difference in the high end proved to be no longer there. To be certain of this we did the same analysis again with the MZ-RH10 (2nd generation Hi-MD) and the difference now appeared obvious. We also did the same analysis on a logarithmic scale so that it is very clear to see that at 1KHz the line representing the MP3 file starts to drop. In this analysis the following color codes have been used:
Green: Uncompressed PCM file
Red: Hi-SP file (ATRAC 3Plus @ 256 kbps)
Purple or blue: MP3 file (256 kbps constant bitrate)
For many this will come as a great relief, but it becomes even better yet. Whereas the 2nd generation Hi-MD抯 could only playback MP3抯 with a sampling frequency of 44.1KHz the MZ-RH1 can also playback Mp3抯 with sampling frequencies of 32 KHz and 48 KHz. For most people this will not mean a great deal because 44.1 KHz is by far the most widely used, but you may accidentally come up against a more exotic MP3 file and that is now no longer a problem either. 32 KHz is still used quite often for audio books and 48 KHz is the sample frequency which is used amongst other things for audio on DVD.
Improved USB Speeds
Something else that was immediately apparent to us on our visit to Sony was that it seemed as if the data transfer via USB was considerably faster than that of the 1st and 2nd generation Hi-MD. Naturally we also tested this in depth and it indeed seems that data transfer via USB has improved considerably in several areas. The first which was already noticeable in earlier Hi-MD抯 was that transferring music was always considerably faster than transferring data through Windows Explorer. This explains why speed improvements for data are much larger than those for audio. This means that the transfer speeds for data and music are now very close to each other but it is clear that they have both increased. Because the exact speeds are somewhat dependant on what you transfer and what the configuration of your PC is, we really want to give an approximate indication of what you can expect. Also we didn抰 configure any special test setup therefore there is no guarantee that you will get these speeds in every situation. Therefore what we have done is to measure the speed differences between the MZ-RH10 (2nd generation Hi-MD) and the RH1 and then expressed these differences as percentages. These percentages are thus an indication of improvements in speed between the last two generations of Hi-MD because we have used the same test setup for both. Because as we said there is also quite a difference depending on whether you transfer many small files or one large file we have also tested these differences. The following table may therefore seem rather confusing and complex and the percentages to vary somewhat, but as mentioned before much is dependant on the exact situation in which you conduct the tests. For this reason, and for the sake of clarity we have summarized the measured differences and it is also useful to note that all these speeds relate to Hi-MD formatted discs. descriptionupload / downloadtypedisc-typeSpeed (MB/sec)improvement
MZ-RH1MZ-RH10
1 file of 135 MBdownloaddata1 GB1,00,5104%
1 file of 135 MBuploaddata1 GB1,10,741%
200 files of 1 MB eachdownloaddata1 GB0,70,477%
200 files of 1 MB eachuploaddata1 GB0,90,569%
Hi-SP (via computer to MD)downloadmusic1 GB0,90,730%
Hi-SP (via computer to MD)uploadmusic1 GB0,40,340%
Hi-SP (own recording)uploadmusic1 GB0,50,442%
1 file of 135 MBdownloaddata80 min0,90,2318%
1 file of 135 MBuploaddata80 min1,10,4149%
100 files of 1 MB eachdownloaddata80 min0,60,2189%
100 files of 1 MB eachuploaddata80 min1,00,3222%
PCM (own recording)uploadmusic80 min0,50,434%
Tabel 3, Improvements in transferspeeds.
If we look at the upload and downloading of music to Hi-MD then this has improved between 30 ?40%. Although uploads are still approximately 2x as slow as downloads the improvement in speed in both cases is about the same.
In particular writing single large files to Hi-MD has greatly improved. However the average of uploads and downloads if taking into account that you are dealing mainly with smaller files means that you will have a speed improvement of on average around 70%. This will be a relief for many people as data transfer via Windows Explorer was generally very slow. It will never be as fast as writing to a hard-drive but as an alternative to a USB stick the RH1 holds its own.
What is particularly noteworthy however is the speed advantage that is gained when transferring data via Windows Explorer to normal MD discs that have been reformatted as Hi-MD discs. Here too there are differences between uploading and downloading large and small files but on average the speed here has increased by about 200%. This means that data transfer has become almost 3x faster for ordinary MD discs. It also means that the difference in speed between 1GB and 80/74/60 min discs has been greatly reduced as a result of which it makes it a lot more attractive to use your old MD discs in Hi-MD mode. Certainly with stories concerning the disappointing durability of rewritable CD抯 and DVD抯 it is perhaps a good idea to use you trusted old MD抯 for storing really important data on. Ordinary MD discs have already been around for nearly 15 years and in that 15 years have proven to be very reliable at storing data (in most cases music).
Another point that is noticeable if we look at the data from the table is that if examined the speed of the MZ-RH1 for 1GB discs is now approaching the maximum quoted by Sony approximately 2 years ago when they first introduced the Hi-MD disc.
Retention of personal settings
A much-aired complaint in previous generations of MD walkman was that the devices did not remember the recording settings that you had chosen. You therefore had to dive right into the menu each time before you started the recording select your chosen recording level (the Automatic Gain Control which is set to on by default is often unusable for professional recordings). Fortunately Sony have changed this with the MZ-RH1. It remembers the settings you have chosen previously and thus these are the defaults for the next recording even if you have swapped the disc in the walkman. The settings are only forgotten if you remove the Li-ion battery from the walkman (for some period of time) and no external adaptor is connected.
Battery charging via USB
As has already been noted the MZ-RH1has no separate connection for the external power adaptor. This is because the supplied adaptor comes with a USB connector. It is possible therefore to use the same cable if you connect the RH1 to the computer as to the provided adaptor. This signifies a space saving in the RH1 as one less connector is necessary, but it also has the advantage that there is just a single external power source (from the RH1抯 point of view) and that is the USB connection. This also means that there is a single charging procedure for the Li-ion battery and that is the 揵est?(full) charging mode. Whereas with previous Hi-MD抯 charging via USB meant a fixed charging period without actually specifying if the battery was fully charged or not, the MZ-RH1 has just a single charging program that is used for both USB and the normal adaptor. With the RH1it actually checks to see how full the battery is and if it is still full then immediately stops charging. It is then displayed how long is needed for the battery to be charged and then the battery will be charged up to about 80% in approximately an hour. Following this the remaining 20% takes about 3 hours although this is not visible on the display of the RH1. This is in fact the same charging procedure as for the MZ-NH1 only the latter could not be charged via USB.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-16 9:50:15编辑过]